Linkdexing Alternative: IndexingURL vs Linkdexing (2026)

Linkdexing and IndexingURL are built on a similar commercial idea, which makes this a clean comparison. Both sell credits instead of monthly subscriptions, and in both cases the credits stay in your account until you use them. If you like paying only for what you need, neither service will feel strange to you.

The real differences are speed, price, and how the work is done. Linkdexing is open about the fact that its process is manual and takes around two weeks. For many people, that wait is the main reason they start searching for a Linkdexing alternative.

In this guide, we compare both services side by side so you can decide with real numbers instead of guesswork. Pricing was checked on 31 October 2026. Please confirm current rates on each provider's website before you buy.

The short answer

• Stay with Linkdexing if a two-week turnaround is acceptable and you prefer a hands-on, manually processed service with one simple rate.
• Choose IndexingURL if you want faster submission, a lower cost per URL on larger batches, and API access for automated workflows.
• Both are credit-based with no subscription, so switching does not add a recurring bill to your budget.

What is Linkdexing?

Linkdexing is a backlink indexing service. According to its own published information, the work is done by hand by a small team rather than by software. That manual approach is the reason for its longer turnaround, which the service states plainly as around two weeks.

Two things stand out in a good way. First, Linkdexing says it does not guarantee a 100% indexing rate, and it explains that pages blocked by a noindex tag, a robots.txt rule, or a redirect will never be indexed. That is accurate, and it is advice worth following no matter which tool you choose. Second, new accounts receive a small number of free credits, so you can test the service before paying.

What is IndexingURL?

IndexingURL is an automated URL submission and indexing monitoring platform. You add your links through the dashboard, by uploading a CSV or text file, or through the API, and the platform sends crawl requests for them. A central dashboard then shows which URLs are indexed, pending, or failed, and lets you export reports.

One credit equals one URL, credits never expire, and there is no subscription. The platform reports an average index time of under three minutes, although, as we explain later in this article, any figure like that should be tested on your own links.

Pricing comparison

Linkdexing pricing

Linkdexing uses one flat rate with no tiers to compare.

What you buyPriceCost per linkEntry package, 200 links$10$0.05Free credits on signup10 creditsFree

IndexingURL pricing

IndexingURL charges a one-time payment per package. The more URLs you buy, the lower the cost per URL.

PackagePriceURLsCost per URLStarter$3100$0.03Platinum$10500$0.02Platinum Silver$201,000$0.02Agency$14510,000about $0.015Agency Silver$55050,000$0.011Agency Gold$1,000100,000$0.01

You can see the current packages on the IndexingURL pricing page.

The same job at different volumes

Here is what the same batch costs at the published rates, assuming Linkdexing's flat $0.05 rate applies at every volume.

Number of linksLinkdexingIndexingURLSaving with IndexingURL100about $5$3about 40%1,000about $50$2060%10,000about $500$145about 71%

At entry level, the gap is modest. At agency volume, it becomes large, because Linkdexing's flat rate does not drop as you buy more while IndexingURL's rate does.

The two-week question

This is the heart of the comparison. Linkdexing states that the whole process is manual and takes around two weeks to reach its best indexing rate. Whether that matters depends entirely on the kind of links you are building:

• Tier-two links, directory submissions, and bulk campaigns. Two weeks hardly matters. You submit them and move on.
• A client placement you must report on this month. Two weeks can use up most of your reporting window.
• A page whose rankings you are actively tracking. Two weeks is a long time to wait to learn whether a link counts.

If you are searching for a Linkdexing alternative, the wait is the most likely reason. Automated submission is the part that addresses it directly.

Feature comparison

FeatureIndexingURLLinkdexingPrice per link$0.01 to $0.03$0.05 flatBillingCredits, no subscriptionCredits, no subscriptionCredits expireNoNoEntry price$3 for 100 URLs$10 for 200 linksMethodAutomated submissionManual work by a teamTypical turnaroundMinutes, as reported by the providerAround two weeksBulk uploadCSV, text file, and APILink list submissionStatus trackingPer-URL dashboard with exportReport after processingAPI accessYes, with documentationNot advertisedFree credits on signupNot listed on the pricing page10 creditsAccount approvalSupport approval before submittingNot requiredFull guaranteeNone can be honestly givenNone, stated plainly

One point deserves a fair mention. IndexingURL asks new users to sign up, verify their email, and contact support for approval before the dashboard opens for submissions. That adds a short step at the start that Linkdexing does not have. Linkdexing's free credits are also a genuine advantage if you want to test a service before paying anything.

Which one should you choose?

Choose Linkdexing if you are happy to wait, you prefer a single flat price with nothing to calculate, or you want to try an indexing service without spending money first.

Choose IndexingURL if two weeks is too long for the links you care about, you work at volume where a lower unit cost adds up quickly, or you want API access so your own tools can submit URLs automatically.

A sensible split: send low-priority bulk links through whichever service is cheaper for your volume, and use the faster option for the handful of links you are actively monitoring. Because neither service charges a subscription, using both costs you nothing extra.

Why indexing results vary with any service

No service can make Google index a page. A tool can ask Google to crawl a URL, but whether that URL is added to the index is a separate decision made afterwards, based on the quality of the page. For this reason, you should treat every success rate you read, including the ones on a provider's own website, as a claim to test rather than a promise.

It also helps to know that Google's documentation describes its Indexing API as intended for job posting and livestream pages. Results on other kinds of pages can therefore differ from batch to batch, and no honest provider can guarantee them.

Most of the variables are in your hands:

• The page must be allowed to index. A noindex tag, a robots.txt block, a canonical tag pointing elsewhere, or a non-200 status code will stop a URL no matter which tool you use.
• The page carrying the link must itself be indexed. A backlink on a page Google ignores will not be counted.
• Content quality matters. Thin, duplicated, or low-value pages are often crawled and then left out of the index.
• Crawl demand and site health count. Slow servers, orphan pages, and wasted crawl budget all slow discovery.

If your URLs show the status "Discovered – currently not indexed" in Search Console, read our guide to the eight proven fixes. To understand the technical causes behind slow indexing, see our article on the five indexing bottlenecks that keep pages out of Google. If you manage a large store, our guide to bulk URL indexing for e-commerce covers product pages in detail.

Cleaning a batch before you submit it usually improves your results more than changing providers does.

How to test either service properly

The only success rate that matters is the one you measure yourself. Here is a simple method:

1. Pick 100 links of similar age and quality.
2. Confirm that none of them is blocked by noindex, robots.txt, or a bad redirect.
3. Split them into two equal groups and submit one group to each service.
4. Check the index status of every URL after one day, one week, and two weeks.
5. Compare the cost per indexed link, not just the cost per submitted link.

This takes very little money to run, and it replaces marketing claims with your own data.

Frequently asked questions

Is IndexingURL cheaper than Linkdexing?

At the published rates, yes. IndexingURL costs between $0.01 and $0.03 per URL depending on the package, while Linkdexing's entry rate is $0.05 per link. The gap widens as your volume grows.

How long does Linkdexing take to index links?

Linkdexing states that its process is manual and takes around two weeks to reach its best indexing rate.

Do credits expire with either service?

No. Both services sell credits that remain usable until you spend them, and neither requires a monthly commitment.

Is manual indexing better than automated indexing?

Neither provider publishes independent evidence that one method beats the other. The honest answer is to test both on the same batch of links and compare the results.

Can any indexing service guarantee that Google will index my links?

No. Google decides what to index based on the quality of each page. A service can request a crawl, but it cannot force inclusion in the index.

Does IndexingURL have an API?

Yes. IndexingURL offers an API with documentation, which is useful for agencies and developers who want to submit URLs automatically. You can read the details on the API documentation page.

The verdict

Linkdexing is a straightforward service with a flat price, no subscription, free starter credits, and candid answers about what it cannot do. If a two-week turnaround suits your work, there is no strong reason to leave.

IndexingURL makes its case on speed, unit cost, and automation. It offers automated submission, per-URL tracking, API access, and prices that fall to $0.01 per URL at volume. If the wait is what sent you looking for a Linkdexing alternative, those are the differences that matter.

Ready to run your own test? Create your IndexingURL account and submit your first batch, then compare the results with your current provider.